Protecting APIs Is a Matter of Public Trust
Agencies operate under some of the strictest security mandates, from the Federal Information Security Modernization Act and Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program to zero-trust architecture. A single, compromised API can quickly trigger violations, investigations and lasting reputational harm.
Not only can this result in consequences such as high response and remediation costs, loss in budgetary support, slower procurement cycles, or stricter oversight, it also often ends in greater public scrutiny. At the heart of digital government is public trust. When an API exposure leaks personal data or disrupts citizen services, it can weaken confidence in government systems — potentially slowing modernization efforts and putting broader digital transformation goals at risk.
Because APIs connect so many critical functions, such as citizen records, payments and identity verification, even one exploited endpoint can have a ripple effect across multiple systems. The rise of automated threats amplifies the challenge: Although APIs make up just 14% of the attack surface, they attract 44% of advanced bot traffic. The bottom line is that protecting APIs is essential for continuity and trust.
RELATED: Government shutdowns don’t have to impact mission continuity.
Securing APIs in a Zero-Trust Framework
APIs must be treated as critical assets, secured with the same rigor as networks, endpoints and identities. Strengthening API security starts with visibility and control. Agencies should consider the following.
Inventory all active and shadow APIs to uncover hidden risks.
One of the hardest parts of managing APIs is simply finding them. As more APIs are developed and deployed across digital services, many go undocumented or unmonitored, creating hidden entry points for attackers. A comprehensive inventory gives agencies the visibility needed to understand their true attack surface.
Use analytics to distinguish real users from bots.
Today’s bots are highly sophisticated, mimicking human behavior so convincingly that they often evade traditional detection. With bots now responsible for more than half of all internet traffic, agencies must invest in advanced analytics tools that can identify what’s behind the traffic on their servers and if they’re being targeted by automated threats.
Enforce least-privilege access and require strong authentication.
At the core of zero trust, least-privilege access ensures that only verified users can reach sensitive systems and data. This minimizes the scope of a potential breach. When paired with strong authentication, it prevents threat actors from accessing critical information, even if they manage to slip in through a weak API.
Regularly test business logic to identify weak spots before attackers do.
Business logic vulnerabilities are among the trickiest to detect, often hiding in the way APIs handle legitimate requests. Regular, proactive testing helps agencies anticipate how attackers might manipulate API behavior and patch weaknesses before they can be exploited. As more APIs are introduced across government architectures, this must become a continuous process embedded in every development cycle.
UP NEXT: CISA’s greenfield is a modernization model in the zero-trust era.
Securing the Future of Digital Government
APIs are not just back-end plumbing. They are the frontline of cyber defense. As threats continue to evolve, agencies must shift from reactive to proactive — embedding API security into every layer of their systems. By taking a zero-trust approach, agencies can protect sensitive data, maintain compliance and preserve the public trust that digital government depends on.